A Decision Theoretic Meta-reasoner for Constraint Optimization
نویسندگان
چکیده
Solving constraint optimization problems is hard because it is not enough to find the best solution; an algorithm does not know a candidate is the best solution until it has proven that there are no better solutions. The proof can be long, compared to the time spent to find a good solution. In the cases where there are resource bounds, the proof of optimality may not be achievable and a tradeoff needs to be made between the solution quality and the cost due to the time delay. We propose a decision theoretic meta-reasoning-guided COP solver to address this issue. By choosing the action with the estimated maximal expected utility, the meta-reasoner finds a stopping point with a good tradeoff between the solution quality and the time cost.
منابع مشابه
Knowledge-Based Control of Decision-Theoretic Planning
This paper proposes a new planning architecture for agents operating in uncertain and dynamic environments. Decisiontheoretic planning has been recognized as a useful tool for reasoning under uncertainty; it calculates an optimal plan using a given planning model (state set, action set, probability distributions over possible state transitions, and utility function). In a dynamic environment, h...
متن کاملKnowledge-Based Control of Decision Theoretic Planning - Adaptive Planning Model Selection
This paper proposes a new planning architecture for agents operating in uncertain and dynamic environments. Decisiontheoretic planning has been recognized as a useful tool for reasoning under uncertainty; it calculates an optimal plan using a given planning model (state set, action set, probability distributions over possible state transitions, and utility function). In a dynamic environment, h...
متن کاملA Proof-Theoretic Subsumption Reasoner for Hybrid EL-TBoxes
Hybrid EL-TBoxes combine general concept inclusions (GCIs), which are interpreted with descriptive semantics, with cyclic concept definitions, which are interpreted with greatest fixpoint (gfp) semantics. We introduce a proof-theoretic approach that yields a polynomial-time decision procedure for subsumption in EL w.r.t. hybrid TBoxes, and present preliminary experimental results regarding the ...
متن کاملSemantics of an Anytime Family of Reasoners
An anytime family of propositional reasoners is a sequenceR0;R1; : : : of inference relations such that each Ri is sound, tractable, and makes more inferences than Ri 1, and each theory has a complete reasoner in the family. Anytime families are useful for resource-bounded reasoning in knowledge representation systems. Although several anytime families have been proposed in the literature, only...
متن کاملExploiting Domain Structure in Multiagent Decision-Theoretic Planning and Reasoning
EXPLOITING DOMAIN STRUCTURE IN MULTIAGENT DECISION-THEORETIC PLANNING AND REASONING MAY 2013 AKSHAT KUMAR B.Tech., INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI M.Sc., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Shlomo Zilberstein This thesis focuses on decision-theoretic reasoning and planning problems that arise when a group of collaborative...
متن کامل